Transition from Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain in a Community-Based Cohort.

The transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP) in community settings has yet to be well understood. We recruited n=131 participants with acute LBP from the community and followed them for 3 and 6-month outcomes. Acute LBP was defined by a duration of < 4 weeks, and participants must have reported a 30-day LBP-free period before the current acute episode. Chronic LBP was defined as pain most or every day over the past 3 months. Baseline psychological, social, and demographic factors were examined as predictors of transition to chronic LBP at 3 months or continuation of chronic LBP at 6 months. The transition from acute to chronic LBP at 3 months was 32.2% ( 38/118). At 6 months, 80.7% (25/111) of participants who transitioned at 3 months continued to have chronic LBP. At 6 months, participants who identified as Black or African American were more likely than white participants to transition to chronic LBP (RR=1.76, 95% CI 1.05, 2.95) and more likely to continue to have chronic LBP (RR=2.19, 95% CI 1.14, 4.21). Those classified at baseline by both LBP most or every day and intensity of at least 30/100 were more likely to transition to chronic LBP (RR=3.13, 95% CI 1.84, 5.30) and continue to have chronic LBP at 6 months (RR=2.58, 95% CI 1.43, 4.16). The STarT Back Screening Tool and the OSPRO-YF were associated with the transition to chronic LBP at 3 months and continuation at 6 months. Participants with higher PROMIS General Health and PROMIS Physical Health scores were less likely to transition to chronic LBP or continue to have chronic LBP at 6 months. These findings identify factors of acute LBP in the community that may predict the transition to chronic LBP. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the mechanisms driving the transition to chronic LBP.

Clinimetric Properties of the Working Alliance Inventory and Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire: Screening Options for Musculoskeletal Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinimetric properties of 2 surveys used to evaluate common factors in the patient-provider relation and present screener options for the assessment of common factors and report their correlation with pain and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 100 individuals (58% women, mean age=34, SD=15; N=100) presenting to physical therapy with musculoskeletal pain in the following regions: 44% lower extremity, 36% spine, 19% upper extremity, 1% undetermined. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) and the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored factor structure of the WAI and CEQ. Internal consistency was evaluated for scales derived from items retained based on factor loadings. Finally, options for screener tools were proposed and assessed based on their correlation to original surveys as well as pain and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The data supported a 4-factor structure for the surveys. Some WAI items were excluded due to cross-loading. The derived four-factor scales demonstrated strong correlations with the original surveys (r=.89-.99) and exhibited good internal consistency (α=.824-.875). Two screening options were suggested: 1 retaining 11 of the original 18 items and the other comprising just 3 items. Both screening tools correlated with the original surveys and showed associations with improvements in pain and functional outcomes (r=-.21-.34). CONCLUSION: The proposed screeners provide concise measurement options to facilitate use in clinical practice. These tools can aid in facilitating patient communication specifically addressing patient expectation and understanding the tasks required to enact behavior change.

Utility of PROMIS Measures in Predicting Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Shoulder Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The decision to treat shoulder osteoarthritis definitively with shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is multifactorial, considering objective findings, subjective information, and patient goals. The first goal of this study was to determine if Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures correlated with patients with shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent SA within 1 year. The second goal of this study was to determine if score cut-offs in PROMIS domains could further discriminate which shoulder OA patients underwent SA within 1 year. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study examined patients with a diagnosis of shoulder OA who consulted an orthopedic provider from November 1, 2020, to May 23, 2022, and recorded PROMIS measures in the domains of Physical Function (PF), Depression, and/or Pain Interference (PI). A surgical group was defined as patients who underwent SA within 1 year of the most recent PROMIS measures, and the non-surgical patients were defined as the control group. Mean PROMIS scores were compared between the surgical and control groups. Separate logistic regression models controlling for age, race, ethnicity, and comorbidity count were performed for each PROMIS domain as a 1) continuous variable, then as 2) binary variable defined by PROMIS score cut-off points to determine which scores correlated with undergoing SA to further characterize the potential clinical utility of PROMIS score cut-offs in relating to undergoing SA. RESULTS: The surgical group of 478 patients was older (68.2 vs. 63.8 years), more often of White race (82.6% vs. 70.9%), and less often of Hispanic Ethnicity (1.5% vs. 2.9%) than the control group of 3343 patients. Using optimal cut-offs in PROMIS scores, PI ≥ 63 (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.97 (2.41-3.64), p < 0.001), PF ≤ 39 (OR = 1.81 (95% CI, 1.48-2.22), p < 0.001), and Depression ≥ 49 (OR = 1.82 (95% CI, 1.50-2.22), p < 0.001) were all found to correlate with undergoing SA within 1 year in multivariable logistic regressions. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that cut-off scores for PROMIS measures differentiated patients undergoing SA within 1 year. These cut-off scores may have clinical utility in aiding in decision-making regarding surgical candidates for SA. Further research is needed to validate these cut-off scores and determine how they relate to patient outcomes after SA.

General and Pain-Associated Psychological Distress Phenotypes Among Patients With Low Back Pain in the Military Health System.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to describe rates of general and pain-related psychological distress for individuals with low back pain (LBP) in the Military Health System (MHS). We identified common phenotypes defined by rates of general and pain-related psychological distress and compared phenotypes on their level of pain interference, physical function, anxiety, and depression. METHODS: We created a cohort from two completed trials assessing nonpharmacological treatment for LBP in the MHS (n = 510 total). The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag assessment tool identified the presence of 11 different yellow flags. Latent class analysis (LCA) used yellow flag indicators to identify common psychological phenotypes. We then compared Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems measures of pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety across phenotypes. RESULTS: LCA identified five phenotypes (percentage of the sample): low distress (32%), high distress (27%), poor pain coping and low self-efficacy (18%), low self-efficacy and acceptance (14%), and poor pain coping (10%). Highly distressed phenotypes reported higher levels of pain interference, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety than those with other phenotypes, whereas the low distress phenotype had significantly lower pain interference and higher physical function scores than those characterized by all other phenotypes. CONCLUSION: These phenotypes provide opportunities for clinicians and researchers to develop novel LBP treatment pathways tailored to patients with different profiles of psychological distress. Future work is needed to validate their predictive capabilities for clinical outcomes.

Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Did Not Alter Pain Sensitivity or Pain Intensity Ratings for Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

Aims and Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to explore whether AIH produces changes in pain sensitivity or in reports of self-reported pain intensity for individuals with low back pain. Methods: In a quasi-experimental, cross-over design we compared participants (n = 9) exposed to normal room air and hypoxia using a commercially available gas blender. The treatment period consisted of 5 consecutive days of randomly assigned to AIH or room air. For the participants initially randomized to AIH there was cross-over to receive 5 more consecutive days of room air. Therefore, this design allowed for between group and within subject assessment of AIH effects. Pain sensitivity was assessed with quantitative sensory testing (QST) for posterior superior iliac spine pressure threshold, plantar thermal threshold, and peak pain ratings. Self-reported pain intensity for low back pain was assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory. Results: There were no between group differences for AIH and room air in pain sensitivity or self-reported pain intensity. In the within subject analyses larger effect sizes favoring AIH were detected for plantar measures of pain sensitivity but not for self-reported pain intensity. Conclusion: This study, while presenting null findings, describes an initial step in determining whether AIH can be used to increase pain relief. Based on this pilot study we offer guidance for future research including study design, AIH dosage, participant selection, and using AIH in combination with non-pharmacologic treatments.

Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium's international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations.

The potential to classify low back pain as being characterised by dominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic mechanisms is a clinically relevant issue. Preliminary evidence suggests that these low back pain phenotypes might respond differently to treatments; however, more research must be done before making specific recommendations. Accordingly, the low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium was established as a group of 36 clinicians and researchers from 13 countries (five continents) and 29 institutions, to apply a modified Nominal Group Technique methodology to develop international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations to provide guidance for identifying the dominant pain phenotype in patients with low back pain, and potentially adapt pain management strategies. The BACPAP consortium's recommendations are also intended to provide direction for future clinical research by building on the established clinical criteria for neuropathic and nociplastic pain. The BACPAP consortium's consensus recommendations are a necessary early step in the process to determine if personalised pain medicine based on pain phenotypes is feasible for low back pain management. Therefore, these recommendations are not ready to be implemented in clinical practice until additional evidence is generated that is specific to these low back pain phenotypes.

Hip-focused physical therapy versus spine-focused physical therapy for older adults with chronic low back pain at risk for mobility decline (MASH): a multicentre, single-masked, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we identified a population of older adults with chronic low back pain, hip pain, and hip muscle weakness who had worse 12-month low back pain and functional outcomes than age-matched adults with only low back pain, indicating an increased risk for future mobility decline. We sought to determine whether tailored, hip-focused physical therapy reduced pain and functional limitations in this high-risk population compared with non-tailored, spine-focused physical therapy. METHODS: We did a multicentre, single-masked, randomised controlled trial at three research-based sites in the USA. We recruited older adults (aged 60-85 years) with hip pain and weakness who reported moderate low back pain intensity at least half the days in the last 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to hip-focused physical therapy or spine-focused physical therapy using permuted blocks with random block size, stratified by site and sex (ie, male or female). The primary outcomes were self-reported disability using the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) and performance-based 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) at 8 weeks. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were collected by study staff via a possible adverse event reporting form and then adjudicated by site investigators. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04009837. FINDINGS: Between Nov 1, 2019, and April 30, 2022, 184 participants were randomly assigned to receive hip-focused (n=91) or spine-focused physical therapy (n=93) interventions. The mean age was 70·7 (SD 6·2) years. 121 (66%) of 184 participants were women, 63 (34%) were men, and 149 (81%) were White. At 8 weeks, the mean between-group difference on the QBPDS was 4·0 (95% CI 0·5 to 7·5), favouring hip-focused physical therapy. Both groups had similar, clinically meaningful gait speed improvements (10MWT) at 8 weeks (mean difference 0·004 m/s [95% CI -0·044 to 0·052]). No serious adverse events were related to study participation. INTERPRETATION: Tailored hip-focused physical therapy demonstrated greater improvements in low back pain-related disability at 8 weeks. However, both hip-focused physical therapy and spine-focused physical therapy produced clinically meaningful improvements in disability and function for this high-risk population at 6 months. These findings warrant further investigation before clinical implementation. FUNDING: US National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health.

If You Build It, Will They Come? Patient and Provider Use of a Novel Hybrid Telehealth Care Pathway for Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the referrals and use of a hybrid care model for low back pain that includes on-site care by physical therapists, physical activity training, and psychologically informed practice (PiP) delivered by telehealth in the Improving Veteran Access to Integrated Management of Low Back Pain (AIM-Back) trial. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2020 through February 2023 from 5 Veteran Health Administration clinics participating in AIM-Back, a multisite, cluster-randomized embedded pragmatic trial. The authors extracted data from the Veteran Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse to describe referral and enrollment metrics, telehealth use (eg, distribution of physical activity and PiP calls), and treatments used by physical therapists and telehealth providers. RESULTS: Seven hundred one veterans were referred to the AIM-Back trial with 422 enrolling in the program (consult-to-enrollment rate = 60.2%). After travel restrictions were lifted, site visits resulted in a significant increase in referrals and a number of new referring providers. At initial evaluation by on-site physical therapists, 92.2% of veterans received pain modulation (eg, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, manual therapy). Over 81% of enrollees completed at least 1 telehealth physical activity call, with a mean of 2.8 (SD = 2.0) calls out of 6. Of the 167 veterans who screened as medium to high risk of persistent disability, 74.9% completed at least 1 PiP call, with a mean of 2.5 (SD = 2.0) calls out of 6. Of those who completed at least 1 PiP call (n = 125), 100% received communication strategies, 97.6% received pain coping skills training, 89.6% received activity-based treatments, and 99.2% received education in a home program. CONCLUSION: In implementing a hybrid care pathway for low back pain, the authors observed consistency in the delivery of core components (ie, pain modulation, use of physical activity training, and risk stratification to PiP), notable variability in telehealth calls, high use of PiP components, and increased referrals with tailored provider engagement. IMPACT: These findings describe variability occurring within a hybrid care pathway and can inform future implementation efforts.

Effect of a Patient Engagement, Education, and Restructuring of Cognitions (PEERC) approach on conservative care in rotator cuff related shoulder pain treatment: a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite similar outcomes for surgery and physical therapy (PT), the number of surgeries to treat rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is increasing. Interventions designed to enhance treatment expectations for PT have been shown to improve patient expectations, but no studies have explored whether such interventions influence patient reports of having had surgery, or being scheduled for surgery. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to examine the effect of a cognitive behavioral intervention aimed at changing expectations for PT on patient-report of having had or being scheduled for surgery and on the outcomes of PT. METHODS: The Patient Engagement, Education, and Restructuring of Cognitions (PEERC) intervention, was designed to change expectations regarding PT. PEERC was evaluated in a randomized, pragmatic "add-on" trial in by randomizing patients with RCRSP to receive either PT intervention alone (PT) or PT + PEERC. Fifty-four (54) individuals, recruited from an outpatient hospital-based orthopedic clinic, were enrolled in the trial (25 randomized to PT, 29 randomized to PT + PEERC). Outcomes assessed at enrollment, 6 weeks, discharge, and six months after discharge included the patient report of having had surgery, or being scheduled for surgery (primary) and satisfaction with PT outcome, pain, and function (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: The average age of the 54 participants was 51.81; SD = 12.54, and 63% were female. Chronicity of shoulder pain averaged 174.61 days; SD = 179.58. Study results showed that at the time of six months follow up, three (12%) of the participants in the PT alone group and one (3.4%) in the PT + PEERC group reported have had surgery or being scheduled for surgery (p = .32). There were no significant differences between groups on measures of satisfaction with the outcome of PT (p = .08), pain (p = .58) or function (p = .82). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RCRSP, PT plus the cognitive behavioral intervention aimed at changing expectations for PT provided no additional benefit compared to PT alone with regard to patient report of having had surgery, or being scheduled to have surgery, patient reported treatment satisfaction with the outcome of PT, or improvements in pain, or function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03353272 (27/11/2017).

Characterizing Acute Low Back Pain in a Community-Based Cohort.

Acute low back pain (LBP) is a common experience, however, the associated pain severity, pain frequency, and characteristics of individuals with acute LBP in community settings have yet to be well understood. The purpose of this manuscript is to categorize and compare acute LBP groups for differences in the following characteristics: 1) sociodemographic, 2) general and physical health, and 3) psychological. This cross-sectional study used baseline data from 131 community-based participants with acute LBP (<4 weeks duration before screening and > 30 pain-free days before acute LBP onset). Two LBP categorization definitions were used based on LBP frequency combined with either: 1) pain interference frequency (impact-based) or 2) pain intensity (intensity-based). Descriptive associations were calculated as prevalence ratios for categorical variables and Hedges' g for continuous variables. Our analyses identified several large associations for impact-based and intensity-based categories for pain interference with activity and with enjoyment in life, global mental health, STarT Back Screening Tool risk category, general health, and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Physical Activity subscale. Larger associations were found with social constructs (racially and ethnically minoritized, performance of social roles, and isolation) when using the intensity-based versus impact-based categorization. This study adds to the literature by providing standard ways to characterize community-based individuals experiencing acute LBP. The robust differences observed between these categorization approaches suggest they may be used to improve the early identification of factors potentially contributing to the development of chronic LBP.

Do You PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)? Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Physical function and pain outcomes vary after arthroplasty. We investigated differences in postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict postoperative PROMIS scores. Methods: Patients who underwent TKA and THA from 2014-2020 were eligible. Preoperative variables including demographics, comorbidities, and pain scores were obtained from the medical record. Patients completed surveys measuring postoperative PF and PI. Descriptive statistics and separate linear regression models for each anatomical location were performed to examine factors predicting postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores. Results: Surveys were completed by 2411 patients (19.5% response rate). Unadjusted mean PF postoperative scores were 47.2 for TKA and 48.8 for THA. Preoperative predictors of lower PF included female sex; body mass index and comorbidities for TKA and THA; and age, tobacco use, and non-White race for THA. Mean PI scores were 47.9 for THA and 49.0 for TKA. Preoperative predictors of increased PI included non-White race and increased body mass index for TKA and THA; higher preoperative pain for TKA; and female sex and increased comorbidity for THA. Conclusions: Postoperative PROMIS scores were similar for TKA and THA, with THA having slightly higher PF and lower PI scores. Regression models using preoperative variables showed similar performance for TKA compared with THA. These findings suggest areas for future development of clinical decision support tools.

Effect of Risk-Stratified Care on Disability Among Adults With Low Back Pain Treated in the Military Health System: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tailored treatments for low back pain (LBP) based on stratifying risk for poor prognosis have emerged as a promising approach to improve quality of care, but they have not been validated in trials at the level of individual randomization in US health systems. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of risk-stratified vs usual care on disability at 1 year among patients with LBP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled adults (ages 18-50 years) seeking care for LBP with any duration in primary care clinics within the Military Health System from April 2017 to February 2020. Data analysis was conducted from January to December 2022. Interventions: Risk-stratified care, in which participants received physiotherapy treatment tailored for their risk category (low, medium, or high), or usual care, in which care was determined by participants' general practitioners and may have included a referral to physiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at 1 year, with planned secondary outcomes of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Physical Function (PF) scores. Raw downstream health care utilization was also reported within each group. Results: Analysis included 270 participants (99 [34.1%] female participants; mean [SD] age, 34.1 [8.5] years). Only 21 patients (7.2%) were classified as high risk. Neither group was superior on the RMDQ (least squares [LS] mean ratio of risk-stratified vs usual care: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.26), the PROMIS PI (LS mean difference, -0.75 points; 95% CI -2.61 to 1.11 points), or the PROMIS PF (LS mean difference, 0.05 points; 95% CI, -1.66 to 1.76 points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, using risk stratification to categorize and provide tailored treatment for patients with LBP did not result in better outcomes at 1 year compared with usual care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03127826.

Partner engagement for planning and development of non-pharmacological care pathways in the AIM-Back trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Embedded pragmatic clinical trials are increasingly recommended for non-pharmacological pain care research due to their focus on examining intervention effectiveness within real-world settings. Engagement with patients, health care providers, and other partners is essential, yet there is limited guidance for how to use engagement to meaningfully inform the design of interventions to be tested in pain-related pragmatic clinical trials. This manuscript aims to describe the process and impacts of partner input on the design of two interventions (care pathways) for low back pain currently being tested in an embedded pragmatic trial in the Veterans Affairs health care system. METHODS: Sequential cohort design for intervention development was followed. Engagement activities were conducted with 25 participants between November 2017 and June 2018. Participants included representatives from multiple groups: clinicians, administrative leadership, patients, and caregivers. RESULTS: Partner feedback led to several changes in each of the care pathways to improve patient experience and usability. Major changes to the sequenced care pathway included transitioning from telephone-based delivery to a flexible telehealth model, increased specificity about pain modulation activities, and reduction of physical therapy visits. Major changes to the pain navigator pathway included transitioning from a traditional stepped care model to one that offers care in a feedback loop, increased flexibility regarding pain navigator provider type, and increased specificity for patient discharge criteria. Centering patient experience emerged as a key consideration from all partner groups. CONCLUSION: Diverse input is important to consider before implementing new interventions in embedded pragmatic trials. Partner engagement can increase acceptability of new care pathways to patients and providers and enhance uptake of effective interventions by health systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT#04411420. Registered on 2 June 2020.

PRISM-Pain Recovery and Integrative Systems Model: A Process-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Approach for Physical Therapy.

The Academy of Orthopedic Physical Therapy Pain Education Manual supports the advancement of modern pain content, and the National Institutes of Health Federal Pain Research Strategy has called for new models for pain management. This Perspective proposes the Pain Recovery and Integrative Systems Model (PRISM) as a new model that addresses the multidimensional nature of pain. PRISM is a salutogenic, integrative, process-based cognitive-behavioral model designed for physical therapist education and practice. PRISM aligns with national and international initiatives to better understand and manage pain, thereby mitigating the global opioid crisis. PRISM aims to address the multidimensional nature of pain while building resilience, nurturing growth, and facilitating pain recovery. IMPACT: PRISM is a salutogenic, integrative, process-based cognitive-behavioral model to guide physical therapists in managing the multidimensional nature of pain.